SKU: 16738228820
string of pearls potted plant

string of pearls potted plant 10

Sale price$20.29 Regular price$22.54
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.63 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 24 - Jul 29

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

string of pearls potted plant 10Senecio rowleyanus Variegatus, commonly known as the Variegated String of Pearls, is a delicate and highly sought after trailing succulent prized for its pastel variegation and unique bead like leaves. A member of the Asteraceae family and native to the arid regions of South Africa, this cultivar adds a touch of soft elegance and whimsy to any indoor plant collection. Each slender vine is lined with perfectly round pearls modified leaves that store

Senecio rowleyanus ‘Variegatus’, commonly known as the Variegated String of Pearls, is a delicate and highly sought-after trailing succulent prized for its pastel variegation and unique bead-like leaves. A member of the Asteraceae family and native to the arid regions of South Africa, this cultivar adds a touch of soft elegance and whimsy to any indoor plant collection.

Each slender vine is lined with perfectly round “pearls” — modified leaves that store water — marbled in shades of green, cream, and soft pink or lilac. The variegation gives the plant a luminous, frosted look, and under bright light, the pink tones intensify for a subtle blush effect. Cascading gracefully from hanging baskets or shelves, Senecio rowleyanus ‘Variegatus’ makes an enchanting focal point for succulent lovers and collectors alike.

Graceful, sculptural, and undeniably photogenic, this trailing beauty brings a pastel, ethereal charm to bright, modern interiors.


Senecio rowleyanus ‘Variegatus’ – Care Guide

Light

Thrives in bright, indirect light and can tolerate a few hours of gentle morning sun. Too little light will reduce variegation and cause leggy growth, while harsh midday sun can scorch the delicate pearls. A south- or east-facing window filtered with sheer curtains is ideal.

Watering

Allow the soil to dry out almost completely between waterings. As a true succulent, String of Pearls stores water in its leaves and is highly sensitive to overwatering. Water sparingly, letting excess drain away fully. In winter, water even less frequently, only when the pearls begin to feel slightly soft.

Temperature and Humidity

Temperature: Prefers warmth between 18–28 °C; protect from cold drafts and temperatures below 10 °C.
Humidity: Low to average humidity is best. Avoid misting, as water droplets can collect between leaves and cause rot.

Soil and Potting

Use a well-draining succulent or cactus mix — a blend of compost, perlite, and coarse sand is ideal. Good drainage is crucial. Plant in a shallow pot with drainage holes, and avoid heavy, compacted soils that retain moisture. Repot every 2–3 years in spring to refresh the mix.

Feeding

Feed lightly every 6–8 weeks in spring and summer with a diluted cactus or succulent fertiliser. Too much fertiliser can cause weak growth and loss of variegation. Do not feed in winter.

Pruning and Maintenance

Trim long, leggy vines to encourage denser growth and propagate cuttings easily by laying them on moist soil. Remove any shrivelled or damaged pearls to maintain a neat appearance. Handle carefully, as the fragile stems break easily.

Growth and Maturity

A moderate grower, Senecio rowleyanus ‘Variegatus’ typically reaches 30–60 cm in trailing length. Under ideal conditions, it produces small, white, cinnamon-scented flowers in late summer. Each strand continues to grow and branch over time, creating a cascading curtain of variegated pearls.

Common Issues

  • Mushy or translucent pearls: Overwatering.

  • Wrinkled pearls: Underwatering or prolonged drought.

  • Faded colour: Insufficient light.

  • Pests: Occasionally affected by mealybugs or aphids — treat with neem oil or insecticidal soap.


Background and Benefits

Native to South Africa’s dry, rocky habitats, Senecio rowleyanus grows as a groundcover or trailing plant that stores water efficiently. The variegated form, ‘Variegatus’, was developed for its pastel colouration, adding ornamental value to its naturally intriguing form.

Perfectly suited for hanging planters, shelves, or sunny windowsills, this plant provides texture, softness, and movement to modern interiors. Its spherical leaves also help reduce indoor dryness by slowly releasing moisture, while symbolically representing prosperity, abundance, and continuity — much like a flowing string of pearls.


Quick Care Summary

  • Light: Bright, indirect light; tolerates gentle morning sun

  • Water: Allow soil to dry almost completely between waterings

  • Temperature: 18–28 °C; avoid below 10 °C

  • Humidity: Low to average; do not mist

  • Soil: Free-draining cactus/succulent mix – compost, perlite, coarse sand

  • Feed: Every 6–8 weeks in spring/summer

  • Growth: 30–60 cm trailing succulent; green, cream, and pink marbled pearls

⚠️ Toxicity note: Mildly toxic to pets and humans if ingested; may cause mild stomach irritation.


Styling Tip

Display Senecio rowleyanus ‘Variegatus’ in a hanging basket or tall planter where its cascading vines can spill freely. Its pastel hues look beautiful in white, gold, or blush pots that complement its delicate tones. Pair it with contrasting succulents like Crassula ovata ‘Gollum’ or Haworthia fasciata for a modern succulent arrangement. Perfect for bright windowsills, sunrooms, or minimalist interiors, this variegated String of Pearls adds softness, elegance, and movement — a living piece of jewellery for your plant collection.

    Shipping Notes
    • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
    • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
    • Delivery to the USA:
    1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
    • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
    Exchange/Return Notes
    • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
    • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
    • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
    • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
    SKU: 16738228820

    Discover Niche Categories That Outsell string of pearls potted plant

    Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

    4.4 ★★★★★
    Based on 21 reviews
    Sort
    Highest Rating
    Newest First
    Oldest First
    Product Reviews
    H
    Verified Purchase
    Hubert Herring
    Alexandria, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    great resource for high school parents
    Format: Paperback
    A terrific book -- on many levels. It is, first, a series of excellent suspense stories, with vivid characterizations of the students seeking admission to Wesleyan. The author found some fascinating students to follow, with the result that the reader really cares what happens to them. Even more important -- especially to someone about to embark on the college hunt -- he provides an invaluable insight into how the admissions process works. The admissions game, I now realize thanks to this splendid tale, is a crazy-quilt mixture: at Wesleyan, at least, the process focuses on the individual, quirks and all, far more than I imagined. At the same time, the process comes off as frighteningly random -- with so much depending on which admissions officer reads the application, and what that person focuses on in the few minutes available. The book is also a vivid reminder that admissions officers are people, too -- people of infinite variety. So it was a pleasure to read -- and it will also prove immensely useful to parents. One common theme kept repeating: take the hard courses, even if it means lower grades. Another: having a passion is a real plus, but the rest of the record can't be a disaster. But those are just the beginning.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on September 11, 2003
    B
    Verified Purchase
    Brian Tarbox
    Natrona Heights, US
    ★★★★★ 4
    Very accurate view of admission (I worked there); compelling read, enlightening even for people who think they already know
    Format: Kindle
    I was a Senior Interviewer during my senior year at Wesleyan 1981 and so I worked with many of the main characters in the book. Although the book describes a later time period it rang entirely true to me. The volume of applications...the controlled chaos...the searching for a hook or a champion for an application was very familiar. At least at Wes it seemed (and seems) that unless one's application has some unusual feature that the school is looking for that year (a particular athlete or a particular musician or a particular tough background that was overcome) the road to admission will be challenging. An area that did surprise me was the emphasis on the family of the applicant...and the degree to which an applicant was held to a higher standard if their parents were deemed to be college fluent. I guess this makes sense and actually provides a leveling of the playing field but it was surprising none the less. It may also be surprising to some that these days you don't just need to convince the gatekeepers that you could be successful at the school..you must also show how your presence would enhance the school. This is of course an enormous burden for most teenagers. Like it or not this is the reality at many "top" schools. If you or your child is applying to college you owe it to yourself to read this book....either to understand the game or to make an informed decision not to play.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2013
    P
    Verified Purchase
    P. Meltzer
    Grantham, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    What is better? The overachieving 6 or underachieving 8?
    Format: Hardcover
    First, let me say that I thought that this was an excellent book and would recommend it to anyone who is at all interested in the college admissions process. Second, I was surprised at how many of the reviewers seemed shocked--shocked!--that applicants got bonus points for coming from minority backgrounds. Was this some kind of revelation? However one thing that surprised me a little bit is how--even moving beyond race entirely--the more advantages you have had in life, the more disadvantageous it will be for your admissions process. For example, I was unaware that having successful parents would be, in essence, held against you on the theory that more would be expected of you. While other reviewers have (jokingly?) said that they would advise their white kids not to check the "Caucasian" box, I might advise my (still very young) kids to say that their parents have been unemployed their whole life. I suppose that the main issue which this whole process really boils down to is the following: As a college applicant, is it more important to succeed in life relative to the world around you (i.e. relative to your classmates, to others of your race, to others of your geographical area, to your own parents' life and accomplishments, etc.) or is it more important to succeed absolutely and not on a relative scale. This book clearly informs us that the answer is the former and not the latter. Whether that should be the answer is another question. For example, say that a student's entire life could be distilled into 2 numbers each on a sliding scale from 1-10. The first number is simply your academic performance (grades, SAT's, course load, etc.) The second number is your background (race, economic circumstances, gender, etc.) In the case of Wesleyan, it seems clear to me that they would rather have a student whose first number was, say, a 6 if his or her second was a 2 (take Mig for example in Steinberg's book) than a student whose first number was an 8 if the second number was a 9 or 10 (take Tiffany Wang for example). Whether that is the right approach is certainly a legitimate issue for discusion and I'm not saying that it's not. I suppose that one of the things that would be interesting to know (even though one never really can know of course) is whether those numbers will change in the future. For example, if one were to know that Mig would always be a 6 and Tiffany would always be an 8, would that change the analysis as to which is the right approach? I suspect that part of the reason that a school like Wesleyan would favor the overachieving 6 over the underachieving 8 is due to the hope or expectation that those trends will continue in the future and that one day the 6 will actually be ahead of the 8. And maybe that's the way it works. Who knows.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2003
    J
    Verified Purchase
    Jeremy W.
    Grantham, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    You will find out how a selective private college evaluate and admit students
    Format: Paperback
    I'm a high school counselor and college advisor. Fifteen years ago when I started my college counseling position, I struggled to understand or explain to students and their parents how a selective private college evaluate and admit students. It was this book that helped me understand the essence of selective private college admissions. Compared to other dry theory books, this book tells the admissions practice as stories that are easy to read, understand, and associate with. I highly recommend this book to students, parents, and new counselors.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2024
    M
    Verified Purchase
    M. Tucker
    Cuba, US
    ★★★★★ 3
    Who edited this mess?!?!?!?
    Format: Kindle
    This is a very interesting work of nonfiction. I found it intriguing and read it very quickly. I actually got invested in these students and their stories and their journey to get admitted to the college that was right for them. BUT, and this is a big but, this book is so poorly edited, it is disgraceful! If a person were reading this for research purposes, and it could be useful for just that, good luck to them. The dates are all over the place. At one point, the kids are being considered for the class of 2004, then it makes a reference to the current year as 2000, then it reverts back to 2004 for a long while, then it mentions how the kids--currently at their various chosen colleges--reacted to the events of 9/11/01. What the hell? It's very confusing. It makes it very difficult to keep things in context.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2013

    recommand products