SKU: 9020180487
automatic plant watering indoor

automatic plant watering indoor Spider Farmer 4 Self-watering System Kits

$22.91 $25.46
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on www.kerrimatt.com >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

automatic plant watering indoor Spider Farmer 4 Self-watering System KitsSpider Farmer 4 Pot Self Watering System Kits for Use in Indoor Grow Tents & Greenhouses : Spider Farmer self watering system uses gravity to automatically feed water from a generous 13 gallon reservoir directly to each pot base, ensures your plants stay perfectly hydratedno electricity needed, no daily checks required. Say goodbye to manual watering with this system that keeps your plants hydrated effortlessly : Using wick lines, plants absorb only

Spider Farmer 4-Pot Self-Watering System Kits for Use in Indoor Grow Tents & Greenhouses

  • 𝐇𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐋𝐄-𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐀𝐔𝐓𝐎 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐒𝐘𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐌: Spider Farmer self-watering system uses gravity to automatically feed water from a generous 13-gallon reservoir directly to each pot base, ensures your plants stay perfectly hydrated—no electricity needed, no daily checks required. Say goodbye to manual watering with this system that keeps your plants hydrated effortlessly
  • 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐈𝐒𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐋: Using wick lines, plants absorb only the water they need, ensuring a balanced watering system that prevents over or under-watering. This self-watering system is designed to keep your plants healthy with the ideal moisture levels
  • 𝐋𝐎𝐍𝐆-𝐋𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐒𝐔𝐏𝐏𝐋𝐘: Fill the 13-gallon reservoir once and enjoy up to 2 weeks of automatic watering! This 4-pack self-watering system will keep your plants happy and lush, even when you’re on vacation
  • 𝐀𝐃𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐁𝐋𝐄 𝐖𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒: Designed to fit your growing needs, each fabric pot base features three sets of wick positions to fit different pot sizes. You can seamlessly switch between 1-2, 3, and 5-7 gallon grow bags, providing a versatile self-watering pot base for various plant needs and pot sizes
  • 𝐀𝐋𝐋-𝐈𝐍-𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐒𝐄𝐋𝐅-𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐊𝐈𝐓: Get everything you need in one powerful package: four self-watering bases, a 13-gallon water reservoir, five 5-gallon grow bags, wick lines, shut-off value box and water tubes. Just set it up and watch your plants thrive!
  • 𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝟒𝐱𝟒 & 𝟓𝐱𝟓𝐅𝐓 𝐆𝐑𝐎𝐖 𝐓𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐒: Each base features a 15.6-inch diameter, perfectly designed to fit 4×4 and 5x5ft grow tents. The Spider Farmer 4-Pot Self-Watering System ensures efficient hydration for your plants, reducing manual watering and optimizing growth. Grow smarter, not harder!
  • Can support 4L of water per plant per week.
  • Keeps 4 plants watered for 3 weeks
  • Silent hydration for your indoor garden — keeps your plants nourished without disturbing your peace.
  • Tips:
    • For best results, lay the Self-Watering Fabric Pot Base, Shut-off Valve Box, and tubes flat on the ground, and always keep the folding bucket filled with water
    • It is recommended to clean the basin every two weeks to prevent root clogging
    • Recommended tent sizes: 120cm x 120cm/ 150cm x 150cm Grow Tent
    • Self-watering pots work best once the roots are well-developed. Seedlings have shallow roots that may not reach the moist soil, so it’s best to wait until they grow longer and stronger.
    • DIY Self-Watering System: Customize your watering needs by adjusting the number of wicks—more wicks, more water. Simple and flexible for every plant.
  • Package contents:
    4x Self-watering Fabric Pot Base
    1x 50L Folding Bucket
    5 X 5 Gallon Grow Bag
    1 X Silicone Tube (4M)
    1X Shut-Off Valve Box
    1X User Manual (Check More)

User Manual

Disclaimer

As with all drip or gravity-fed systems, occasional cleaning is required to prevent root or nutrient buildup. Performance may vary based on plant type, nutrient concentration, and environment.

 

1.What are the advantages of the Spider Farmer Self-watering system?

（1）Gravity-Fed Watering System: No Electricity Required, Zero Energy Consumption

Our automatic watering system operates without any power or main water pressure. It relies on gravity to provide a continuous water supply. To ensure optimal performance, please keep the Self-Watering Fabric Pot Base, Shut-off Valve Box, and all silicone tubes flat on the ground. Additionally, ensure that the folding bucket is always filled with water for a consistent flow.

By leveraging gravity, our system effortlessly delivers water to your plants as needed, ensuring they stay hydrated without the hassle of manual watering.

（2）Supports Up to 130 lbs: Robust Base for Heavy-Duty Plant Containers

Engineered for strength, the system’s base is designed to support up to 130 lbs, making it ideal for larger or heavier pots. Whether you’re managing a large garden setup or working with dense soil and substantial plants, this system offers the stability and durability needed for long-term performance.

（3）Accommodates Up to 7-Gallon Fabric Pots

Versatility meets capacity. Our self-watering kits is compatible with self-watering plants pots up to 7 gallons, providing ample space for root development and plant growth. This flexibility makes it suitable for a wide range of plants, from vegetables and fruits to ornamental flowers and shrubs.

（4）Engineered for Durability: Built to Last for Years of Repeated Use

Constructed from premium-grade materials, this system is designed to withstand the rigors of continuous use. Resistant to wear and tear, it ensures reliable performance across multiple growing seasons, offering long-term value and reducing the need for replacements.

（5）Complete Watering Solution: Includes Reservoir, Self-Watering Pots Bases, Cotton Rope, and Grow Bags

The kit offers a comprehensive solution for self-watering, featuring a water reservoir, self-watering pot bases, efficient wick lines for controlled moisture distribution, and durable 5-gallon fabric grow bags. This all-in-one package provides everything you need for quick setup and optimal plant hydration.

（6）Innovative Reservoir Plate: Prevents Algae Growth and Water Buildup

The integrated reservoir plate elevates your fabric pot above standing water, preventing stagnation and reducing the risk of algae formation. This thoughtful design promotes a healthier root environment and decreases maintenance, helping to extend the system’s lifespan while ensuring optimal plant health.

2. What size tents are suitable for matching 2 / 4 pcs Self-watering Kits?

2 pcs Self-watering Pots Base System Kit: 3×3’/4×2′ Grow Tent
4 pcs Self-watering Pots Base System Kits: 4X4’/ 5X5′ Grow Tent

3.50L Water Reservoir Duration for Different Setups

Knowing how long a filled 50L water bucket will last is essential for proper plant care. Keep in mind that actual duration may vary based on the type of plants and their growth stages. Here’s a general guideline for our self-watering system:

2-Pot Setup:
A full 50L bucket typically lasts about one month for two self-watering fabric pots, providing consistent moisture for healthy growth.

4-Pot Setup:
In a four-pot configuration, the same 50L reservoir will last around two weeks. This is great for ensuring multiple plants receive adequate hydration while reducing maintenance.

Note:
Different plants have different water needs. Monitor them regularly to adjust for optimal moisture levels.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 9020180487

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell automatic plant watering indoor

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 1257 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
L
Verified Purchase
Lyndon Unger
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009
J
Verified Purchase
J. E. Lindsey
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Contrasts
Format: Paperback
Cowan tells us, "This is a book about apologetics methodology, not a book of apologetics per se. That is, it is not a book that seeks to do apologetics as much as a book that discusses how one ought to do apologetics" (8). Cowan has achieved the stated purposes of this book in many ways, but due to limited space I will stay focused on three examples; Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts, format, and conclusion by Cowan. Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts (21-24) in this initial section of the book provide a clear and useful starting place for persons who are not academically familiar or comfortable with many terms used in the book. The fact that the key terms section included and defined conceptual terms supports the stated purpose of the book being a methodological rather than an apologetic book with multiple views from various writers' specific understandings and preferred styles of apologetics. As a new person to formal apologetics, this section helped launch me smoothly into the methodological discussions. I returned to these pages a few times to reacquaint myself with meaningful concepts. The format of the discussion with proponents making a methodological case for their form of apologetic followed by critiques from supporters of other apologetic systems brought clarity to the five methods addressed in this book. This format help to highlight both strengths and weaknesses in methods. Cowan as the general editor achieved the goal of keeping the writers away from apologetics and on the goal of providing defense and critiques of these five methods. Each supporter had a unique "tee-up" to their sections. Craig starts by stating, "...methodology in Christian apologetics...raising the age-old issue of the relationship between faith and reason." He goes on further in his introduction to tell a story about his struggle at Wheaton College and why his methodology was helpful to his faith (26). Habermas clarifies that his form of evidential apologetics is, "...characterized as the one-step approach..." (92).This initial piece of information was insightful to me and a helpful clarification between classical and evidential methods. Feinberg on Cumulative Apologetics points out, "A good place to begin the discussion of apologetic methodology is to ask about the nature of the case for theism and Christianity" (148). Frame was probably the most direct in his initial statement by saying, "In apologetics, as in every aspect of the Christian life, the most important thing is to glorify God. Therefore, it is important for us to look in God's Word, the Bible, to see if our Lord gives us any directives relevant to the apologetic task" (208). In principle agree, but I will admit, I find his form of apologetics to be too circular in nature to be convincing to an unbelieving skeptic - as a standalone method. Christians I think would all say, well of course. Clark's section begins with stories meant to set the stage that it is reasonable have faith. Clark writes, "My suppose-this and suppose-that stories are intended to raise the problem of the relationship of our important beliefs to evidence" (267). Each of the five supporters of their method successfully introduced their unique method of apologetics. Cowan regarding to his conclusions says, "Hopefully, this will not only help you, the reader, make your own decisions regarding apologetic methodology, but will also provide a basis for further discussion of the topic among scholars. Cowan's conclusions assured that main points of agreement and disagreement were clear. Here as with the other sections, the textual comments were method focused. My criticism is pointed at the spirit of the debate. The writers did not draw enough contrasting between apologetic methods to clearly show that their individual method should be favored. I think the tone was a little too stilted in the direction of "playing" nice. In a book that purports to have five methods, there were times it seemed like only three or four methods. I guess this is inescapable give that each apologetic style can share some parts in common with another. Yet Craig shares my feeling here, I believe, based on his statement, "Pity our poor editor! Ideally he would like to find a wild-eyed fideist on one end of the spectrum and a hard-nosed theological rationalist on the other. Instead he winds up with a presuppositionalist who argues like an evidentialist..." (122). Overall Five Views on Apologetics provides a good compare and contrast resource for anyone interested in these five common methods of apologetics.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2011
M
Verified Purchase
Mimi
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Condense Analysis of 5 of the most notable Apologist
Format: Paperback
Looking for a quick reference guide to the major theorist of Apologic study, this book is a great resource.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2024
W
Verified Purchase
Will L.
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Not an Intro to Apologetics
Format: Paperback
This book is not for the first-time student of apologetics. It's deep and, at times, difficult. However, for anyone with a serious interest in apologetics, this is a great way to find out which method suits your apologetic style and why. It was eye-opening for me. I am confident that God can use most (if not all) of the five distinct methods covered in the book. But it was very helpful to me to consider pros and cons of each and decide which approach seemed appropriate for me. Great book, if you feel ready for it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2006
R
Verified Purchase
rkveale
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 4
Good overview of apologetic methods but ....
Format: Paperback
I very much enjoy the counterpoint series by Zondervan. It can help me quickly come up to speed in a variety of theological topics. This book has 5 contributors and each one presents, each one comments on each other's essay and finally each one has some concluding remarks which allows the reader to readily judge the competing opinions. However after reading the various approaches it appears to me that the apologetical approach one uses is not as important as learning the various theistic arguments (both positive and negative) and then putting them into practice. I'm not convinced that studying apologetic methods will be that helpful. This is because the various approaches overlap and also because when actually talking with people one must be very flexible and move deftly with the flow of conversation. Yet still I give this book 4 stars as there are 5 top Christian thinkers contributing to this subject. On a personal note, one reason I read this book is because I was puzzled by presuppositional apologetics. I stand firmly in the reformed camp and I audited iTunesU courses in apologetics from Reformed Theological Seminary and Westminster Theological Seminary and was still confused on how presuppositional apologetics works in actual practice. I must sat that after reading this book I still don't see how this approach is useful in defending the faith. I have respect for John Frame but this apologetical approach seems more like a non-approach. I'll be moving on to more fruitful endeavors such as actually learning specific defenses for the Christian faith.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 23, 2011

recommand products

8L Sansevieria Potting Mix | Snake Plant Soil-Less Gritty Mix
28.92
Sansevieria Bacularis Upright Air Purifying Plant
24.08
Snake Plant Zeylanica - Medium (16-17" tall) Grow Pot
28.41
Buy Air Purifier Snake Plant Kokedama with Ceramic Plate online from Nurserylive at lowest price
23.45
Snake plant Sansevieria bacularis Pfennig ex A.Butler & Jankalski – Wild Lark
20.57