SKU: 78377854566
large ponytail palms for sale

large ponytail palms for sale Ponytail palm 'Beaucarnea recurvata' 2 Gal / Teal / Without Pot

$18.59 $20.66
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on www.kerrimatt.com >

Pay in installments of $5.17 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 23 - Jul 28

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

large ponytail palms for sale Ponytail palm 'Beaucarnea recurvata' 2 Gal / Teal / Without PotIntroducing the ponytail palm, known as Beaucarnea recurvata. Native to Southern Brazil, the ponytail palm is also known as the "elephant's foot palm or elephant foot tree" because of its enlarged lower trunk, which resembles an elephant's foot. Within the agave family, the ponytail palm is a distinct plant that, despite its name, is not a true palm. Its cascading, strap like leaves resemble a ponytail, adding to its unique and elegant appearance.

Introducing the ponytail palm, known as Beaucarnea recurvata. Native to Southern Brazil, the ponytail palm is also known as the "elephant's foot palm or elephant foot tree" because of its enlarged lower trunk, which resembles an elephant's foot.

Within the agave family, the ponytail palm is a distinct plant that, despite its name, is not a true palm. Its cascading, strap-like leaves resemble a ponytail, adding to its unique and elegant appearance. This misconception often arises because its bulbous trunk and graceful foliage evoke the look of a palm tree. Ponytail palms are actually succulents, despite popular belief. Whether it's a succulent or a true palm itself, it adds a touch of tropical flair and botanical fascination to every area of your home. 

This stunning ponytail palm succulent boasts unique features, such as long, slender leaves that cascade gracefully from its bulbous trunk.

Ponytail palms grown in gardens as landscape plants typically grow no taller than 11 feet, while indoors, they rarely exceed 4 feet in height.

The Ponytail Palm is a popular houseplant with a distinctive appearance and a thick, bloated brown stem that stores water at its thick, swollen stem and trunk base, often called a bulb or caudex.

The flowers of the ponytail palm rarely bloom when grown as a houseplant. When it blooms in late winter to early spring, it has small, nocturnal, pure white flowers that appear on long stalks that emerge from the center of your ponytail palm succulent.

The ponytail palm is a slow-growing plant with an impressive lifespan, reportedly living up to 150–200 years. Its longevity and ease of care make it a popular choice for indoor plants, offering beauty and companionship that can last for generations.

The ponytail palm Beaucarnea recurvata, is more closely related to desert plants in the Agave and Yucca genera.

When and How to Water Your Ponytail Palm

Like succulents, the ponytail palm is drought-tolerant with its fleshy, water-storing stems that can hold a lot of water.  However, their root structure is easily susceptible to overwatering, so make sure that you don't overwater, as it can lead to root rot and fungal infections.

In the spring and summer, during the growing season, the ponytail palm prefers regular watering. You'll want to keep the soil evenly moist but not soggy. Allow the top few inches of soil to dry out between waterings to prevent overwatering, which can lead to root rot.

In fall and winter, during the dormant period, to reduce the frequency of watering. The Beaucarnea recurvata growth slows down, so it won't require as much water. In spite of the right watering frequency of about 2–3 weeks, ponytail palm Beaucarnea recurvata roots can be damaged if the soil is not fast-draining. 

If you need to pot up a new ponytail palm, choose a container with enough drainage holes. Allow the soil to dry out more between waterings, but don't let it completely dry out. Aim for a balance where the soil is slightly moist but not overly wet. 

Light Requirements - Where to Place Your Ponytail Palm

When growing Ponytail palm indoors, it thrives in bright, indirect light but can also tolerate lower light levels. Placing it near a sunny window or in a well-lit room is ideal. However, be cautious of exposing your ponytail palm to direct, intense sunlight, as it may scorch the leaves. If they don't receive enough bright light, their stems may grow leggy, become paler, and develop curly leaves. So make your ponytail palm happy and give it plenty of light.

If you are growing your ponytail palm outdoors, it can withstand full sun, but it prefers to grow in areas with some partial shade and avoid prolonged direct sunlight.

Learn to adjust your ponytail palm plant to avoid burns if the location where you have Beaucarnea recurvata is exposed to too much direct sunlight. Gradually increase the exposure until it can handle the full sun.

It's critical to remember that during a heatwave or periods of extreme heat, your Beaucarnea recurvata ponytail palm could still sustain sun damage or get sunburned. In this situation, you can protect your ponytail palm by moving it indoors or to a shaded area. 

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs 

When it comes to choosing the right soil for your adorable ponytail palm, you need to be careful. You see, the amount of moisture in the soil can literally make or break your little green friend. You've got root and stem rot faster than you can say "cactus." That's why we at Planet Desert have got your back with our Soil cactus mix blend 1 gal 4 qt cacti succulent dirt compost growing media. This organic mycorrhiza helps grow a healthy root system that makes all those thick, swollen stems stand tall and proud.  As an okay alternative, you can create your own succulent mix by combining equal portions of perlite, coarse sand, and good natural potting soil. 

Ideally, you should look for a natural fertilizer with an approximate blend of 5-10-15 that is higher in phosphorus than nitrogen. The best choice is to use natural fertilizer, as ponytail palm Beaucarnea recurvata lasts longer and keeps your soil alive by adding other beneficial compounds and microbes that encourage ponytail palm health and nutrient absorption. 

Hardiness Zones & More

When it comes to indoor care, this Beaucarnea recurvata ponytail palm prefers average room temperatures between 65 and 75°F, making it suitable for most indoor settings. It can tolerate slightly cooler temperatures, but it's best to avoid extreme cold drafts or sudden temperature fluctuations.

The ponytail palm Beaucarnea recurvata can tolerate average indoor humidity levels, but it appreciates a bit of dry air from time to time. Misting the leaves occasionally or placing the pot on a tray filled with pebbles and water can help create a slightly more humid microclimate around the ponytail palms.

If you are living in USDA zones 9–11, you can grow your ponytail palm outdoors year-round. It thrives in warm climates and can tolerate full sun to partial shade outdoors.

 In terms of temperature, it can withstand temperatures as low as 30°F for short periods, but it's generally recommended to protect it from frost and freezing temperatures.

 It can tolerate low humidity levels, making it a great choice for outdoor landscapes in drier regions. However, it's important to note that excessive humidity or prolonged exposure to high humidity can lead to fungal issues or root rot.

Remember, the ponytail palms, as slow-growing species, can't stand frost or too much humidity; therefore, they need warm, dry conditions. A balanced ponytail palm care will help you maintain temperatures and prevent too much moisture.

Wildlife - Ponytail Palm Attracts the Following Friendly Pollinators

The Ponytail Palm has small, fragrant flowers that can attract pollinators such as bees, butterflies, or hummingbirds. While it’s primarily grown as an ornamental indoor plant, providing outdoor exposure during flowering can support local pollinator populations and enhance the plant’s natural beauty.

Butterflies
Bees
Hummingbirds
Lady Bugs
Multi Pollinators
Other Birds

According to the ASPCA, the Ponytail Palm is non-toxic to humans, cats, dogs, and other common household pets. Its pet-friendly nature makes it an excellent choice for homes with animals, as it poses no significant health risk if leaves are chewed or ingested.

How to Propagate Your Ponytail Palm

The ponytail palm can be propagated through seeds or by offshoots that develop around the base of the ponytail palm plant. This method allows for quicker growth and ensures that the new plant retains the same characteristics as the parent plant. Repotting Ponytail palms is best done in the spring when the plant is actively growing. Be sure to use a well-draining potting mix to prevent root rot.

Key Takeaways

  1. The Ponytail Palm features a large, bulbous base known as a caudex, which stores water, making it highly efficient in surviving extended periods of drought.
  2. This plant is exceptionally low-maintenance and thrives in dry conditions, requiring infrequent watering and minimal care, making it perfect for busy individuals.
  3. Its long, narrow, and arching leaves cascade from the top of the trunk, resembling a ponytail, giving the plant its signature look and adding elegance to any space.
  4. The Ponytail Palm is a slow-growing plant, making it ideal for indoor settings, as it maintains its compact size for years with proper care.
  5. The Ponytail Palm is a slow-growing plant, making it ideal for indoor settings, as it maintains its compact size for years with proper care. (duplicate)

Final Thoughts

Overall, the Ponytail Palm (Beaucarnea recurvata) is a versatile and low-maintenance plant that can be a wonderful addition to both indoor and outdoor spaces. With its unique appearance and ability to adapt to different light conditions, it can brighten up any room or garden. Indoors, it prefers bright, indirect light and average room temperatures. Outdoors, it thrives in warm climates and can tolerate full sun to partial shade. Don't miss out on this opportunity to add something truly exceptional to your garden. Order your very own Beaucarnea recurvata, or ponytail palm, today!

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 78377854566

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell large ponytail palms for sale

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 20 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark W. Miller
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
the garden was a real place, legends do have seeds of truth
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
very well researched and the use of multiple sources/ events used to lock in events and CHRONOLOGIES is done with a sense of going where the evidence leads, instead of trying to CREATE a narrative. it is amazing how the people and place names shift thru the various empires and then later, the legends. very interesting that the exodus event vanquishes egypt, the the hyksos/ indo europeans take over and loot upper egypt. I totally agree with shishak mistake and new chronology. I find it fascinating king Akhenaten and tut were contemporary with king david and soloman. very interesting read about etruscians/ rome and carthage being remnants of troy. I love history this was a very interesting read. but be prepared for a menagerie of languages and names.....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2020
P
Verified Purchase
Paco
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 4
Time will tell.
Format: Paperback
The New Chronology, the unorthodox historical time frame upon which this book is based, may be regarded by Professor Kitchen and other expert scholars in this field as 'one hundred per cent rubbish' but that does not prevent this book from being a very interesting and enjoyable read. As to the correctness or otherwise of the theory advanced, only time will tell.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2013
K
Verified Purchase
KEN TELLS ALL
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
From Eden to Exile: The Five Thousand Year History of The People of The Bible
Format: Paperback
Well written book about a very interesting subject. Author is basically restructuring the traditionally accepted royal dynasty time periods of the Egyptian Pharaohs. I do accept that the traditional ancient time spans are mostly not accurate. This inaccuracy causes problems when trying to date other cultures of the same periods. The prime example is the biblical history of the Hebrews. When adjusting the Egyptian historical writings to around 200 years later you then do see references to accounts of a people who might have been the ancient Hebrews. It is interesting that we accept Egyptian history, as written in stone, but not the Hebrew written history. This author, and others, are disputing this accepted dating of Egyptian royal dynastic rule. The author tells a purely historical biblical history leaving religious commentary out of it. I don't agree with all his story but a great part of it is very possible. The bible is a religious and historical writing but it is possible to separate the two. The possibility of this new time frame being correct would change present day archaeology dramatically and would likely confirm much of secular biblical history. Ancient history of a particular culture must be correct in order to say if another culture existed at the same time. Right now Egyptian dating is being used to judge as to whether the biblical history is true. This of course is a very dubious yard stick. Who says ancient Egyptian writings are 100% true? Many have been found to be for political & religious purposes and not necessarily true. This book is an eye opener and puts a big ? mark about current historical dating and what is true and false about ancient Israel !
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2010
S
Verified Purchase
Sharon Dooley
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 3
Hmmm.
Format: Paperback
LOVED Pharaohs and Kings. Agree with New Chronology. But here, there is much to disagree with as he tries to explain away pre-flood events, he ties in Scripture with other local peoples ancient stories in ways that make God and His works look like a local god, little "g" - nothing to see here kind of god. The angel God places at the entrance to the Garden of Eden with a fiery sword a demon? The ark made out of reeds? Local flood, etc. I annotated the first half of this book to death, but after the flood, I annotated less and less as there was much more to agree with. I am open minded - I know there is archeological evidence as well as epigraphical evidence. But if it completely disagrees with Biblical text, it cannot work. I like Dave Rohl. You will probably get a lot out of most of the book, but he takes us completely down a different path than I expected pre-flood.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 6, 2013

recommand products

Buy 'Lace Aloe - Aloe Aristata' Care and Growing Guide
26.19
'Lace Aloe
29.18
Aloe aristata | Aristaloe Aristata
21.52
Crassula Perforata (String of Buttons)
20.37
Echeveria 'Draco' – Surreal Succulents
24.03