Pay in installments of $5.98 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 23 - Jul 28
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
philodendron giganteum var blizzard Philodendron Giganteum Blizzard Variegated – INDONESIAPLANTSSee photos for reference to the plant features only. They are likely sent to you as featured with the descriptions below. Minimum of 3 Leaves Plants shipped will have a minimum of 3 leaves and will be rooted, not cuttings. Philodendron Giganteum Blizzard Variegated: Striking Variegation for the Bold Collector The Philodendron Giganteum Blizzard Variegated offers bold and stunning variegation, making it a standout in any collection. Known for its
See photos for reference to the plant features only. They are likely sent to you as featured with the descriptions below.
Minimum of 3 Leaves
Plants shipped will have a minimum of 3 leaves and will be rooted, not cuttings.
Philodendron Giganteum Blizzard Variegated: Striking Variegation for the Bold Collector
The Philodendron Giganteum Blizzard Variegated offers bold and stunning variegation, making it a standout in any collection. Known for its dramatic white and green patterns, this plant combines elegance with a touch of wildness. Its large leaves add a sense of grandeur, making it a must-have for collectors.
Key Features of Philodendron Giganteum Blizzard Variegated:
- Bold Variegation: The striking white and green variegated leaves make this plant an eye-catching beauty.
- Large, Glossy Leaves: As a large Philodendron, its impressive leaves grow to a substantial size, creating a sense of grandeur.
- Unique Appearance: The contrast of the variegated foliage offers a distinctive, wild aesthetic.
Before → After: What Changes When ‘Blizzard’ Arrives
- Before: Corners feel flat, neutrals look a little too quiet, and smaller plants disappear in wide rooms.
- After: A single statement leaf becomes the focal point. Philodendron giganteum ‘Blizzard’ throws broad, shield-to-paddle leaves layered with snowy splashes, cream sectors, and mint flecks over rich green. The canopy reads architectural and luminous—like light brushed onto foliage. Even one mature leaf anchors a vignette; several create a soft, gallery-scale backdrop.
Why ‘Blizzard’ Works in Real Rooms
Giganteum is built for scale: generous blades, confident petioles, and a composed, self-heading habit that stays tidy when staged in a tall, drainage-forward planter. The variegation pattern is naturally variable—from whispery freckles to bold half-moons—so every plant looks like a one-of-one. In bright, diffused daylight, the pale panels glow without glare and the green fields ground the composition, making large spaces feel finished.
Placement Map (5 Quick Wins)
- Console Anchor: Center the planter, then offset a travertine tray or linen-bound books to one side—negative space lets the leaf silhouette read clearly.
- Window Flank: East-facing glow behind sheers creates even luminance; the snow-white sectors “light up” at sunrise.
- Dining Niche: Keep 20–30 cm from the wall so leaves cast soft shadows—instant depth on pale plaster or limewash.
- Office Backdrop: Place just behind the camera line for video calls; broad leaves frame your shot without visual noise.
- Plant Cluster Hero: Pair with one velvety companion (Anthurium or Philodendron gloriosum) to contrast textures while ‘Blizzard’ leads on scale and light.
Care Blueprint (Simple, Repeatable Rhythm)
- Light: Bright, diffused daylight all day. Filter strong midday sun to protect pale tissue. If petioles stretch or whites mute, raise overall brightness (still filtered) rather than fertilizer.
- Water: When the top 2–3 cm (≈1 in) of mix dries, water thoroughly and let runoff clear. Favor steady moisture—not constantly wet—to preserve clean margins on high-white areas.
- Substrate: Oxygen-forward aroid blend—chunky orchid bark + coco fiber/coir + pumice/perlite, plus a modest sphagnum buffer and a touch of horticultural charcoal. Air first, even moisture second.
- Climate: Comfortable at 18–29 °C (65–85 °F) and ~50–70% RH with gentle airflow. A mild humidity bump refines big-leaf unfurls.
- Feeding: Light nutrition at ¼–½ strength in active months supports confident sizing and color clarity; prioritize light quality before extra feed.
- Shaping: Although largely self-heading, a discreet stake keeps the crown centered as leaves size up. Rotate a quarter-turn every two weeks for even color development around the canopy.
- Grooming: Dust two leaves weekly with a soft cloth so snow-white sectors photograph crisp; remove spent sheaths for a polished finish.
- Pet note: As with many aroids, keep foliage out of nibbling reach.
Troubleshooting (Signals → Adjustments)
- Long gaps / smaller leaves: Increase overall luminance (still filtered) and verify the newest leaf lives in your brightest safe pocket.
- Brown on white sectors: Usually late watering or unfiltered sun; tighten cadence and add sheer coverage.
- Perpetually wet mix: Boost bark/pumice fraction or step down one pot size to restore aeration.
- Dull new growth: Check light first; resume gentle feeding only after brightness is optimized.
Styling Palette
Planter finishes that flatter the snow-on-green story: sand, ecru, oatmeal, or charcoal in matte stoneware. Materials like raw oak, rattan, microcement, and honed travertine echo the natural, calm luxury of large, patterned leaves.
Kindly reach out to us at [email protected] if you have difficulties in your purchase or have any questions.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 27 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Very Cute!!!
I love it. It’s classy and very sturdy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Very nice! Glad I ordered it ☺️
It's a very nice product. I'm glad I ordered it
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2026
★★★★★ 5
A simple book with a powerful message!
Format: Paperback
A simple book with a powerful message!
If you are looking for a laymen’s guide on the arguments for the resurrection of Jesus, from every conceivable angle, then this book is for you. Habermas and Licona are two Bible scholars that have joined forces to provide both new and mature believer with everything they need to know to share their faith and knowledge on the resurrection of Jesus.
One of the great strengths of the book is that right from the start Habermas and Licona give us what they believe is a very powerful strategy for sharing the story of the resurrection which they call a “minimal facts approach.” The great advantage of this approach is that we can stick to the topic of the resurrection and not get sidetracked to issues on the reliability of the Bible. In addition this approach considers only those data that are so strongly attested historically that almost every scholar (including the skeptical ones) accept their truthfulness.
Under this approach the authors suggest that the first four facts below are almost universally accepted by all types of scholars while the fifth fact is accepted by a majority of scholars:
1. Jesus died by crucifixion.
2. Jesus’ disciples believed that he rose and appeared to them.
3. The church persecutor Paul was suddenly changed.
4. The skeptic James, brother of Jesus, was suddenly changed.
5. The tomb was empty.
The book also discusses the many different theories that skeptics have used down through the centuries to debunk the resurrection of Jesus. Some of the most popular theories include: the resurrection being a legend, the disciples stole the body, the witnesses went to the wrong tomb, the apparent death theory and the hallucination hypotheses. One by one Habermas and Licona give detailed reasons why each theory fails to align with the five minimal facts shared above. Throughout the book the authors appeal to both biblical and extra-biblical sources to make their case.
I especially enjoyed reading Chapter 8 – Naturally Speaking. In this chapter science, miracles and near-death experiences are discussed and the reader comes away with the realization that God does indeed exist.
Throughout the book a myriad of charts help to summarize each different idea and theory making it easy to remember the main arguments used to equip the believer with everything they need to make the case for the resurrection of Jesus.
I also found the chapter on People Skills especially practical in helping to prepare us with the wisdom we need to share everything we have learned in the book with skeptics and non-believers.
The appendix provides a very detailed outline of all the arguments and is the perfect refresher course for the book. The many pages of notes are an excellent source for anyone desiring to go deeper into the material. Finally the interactive game CD is a great way to reinforce many of the ideas from the book and is a fun way to help remember important themes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2016
★★★★★ 5
An Excellent Book that Appeals to All Levels of Inquiry
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus by Gary R. Habermas and Michael R Licona makes a persuasive case for the historical resurrection of Jesus. What I like about this book is that it is structured for different levels of interest. The first 150 pages gives the basic facts surrounding the resurrection and addresses the major objections to the resurrection. The next seventy pages deals with the lesser known objections and offers some suggestions on how to dialog with objectors. The Appendix is almost thirty pages of a detailed outline of information provided which leads to the uniqueness of this book. It does more than gives you information; it makes a valent attempt for the reader to remember this information.
The authors helps the reader remember the information provided by providing nineteen flow charts which outline each major point (very helpful), the appendix, highlighted summaries, and a DVD game. The flow charts allowed me to quickly see the flow and the connection of each major point. The highlight summary sections quickly state the main points. The DVD game is imaginative and fun and is divided into ten categories with some two hundred questions which reinforced the material. The appendix is another avenue to gain quick access to the information.
The material and arguments are from a minimalist approach. The authors focus on information that almost all historians agree upon and how a historian determines the likelihood of an event. The mindset of a historian is not to say that something is true or false but to determine a scale or gradient to determine if something ranges from very doubtful to very certain. Some of the criteria of evaluating an event include multiple independent witnesses, attestation by enemies, embarrassing admissions, eyewitness testimonies, and early testimonies supporting the historical claims. When it comes to the resurrection of Jesus there are at least four and possibly five facts that land in the “very certain” category.
The historical claims that are graded in the very certain category are these four. One, Jesus died by crucifixion which is supported by five non-Christian sources. Two, the disciples of Jesus believed that He rose and appeared to them which is supported by nine sources in three categories pointing to a multiple and very early eyewitness testimony. Not only did the disciples of Jesus believe that they personally saw the resurrected Jesus, but they were willing to suffer for that belief which is attested to by seven ancient sources. Three, the church persecutor, Paul, was suddenly changed and became a martyr for this testimony which is supported by seven ancient sources. Four, Jesus’ skeptic brother, James, was converted and became a follower of Jesus which resulted in him becoming a martyr for this belief as reported by Josephus, Hegesippus, and Clement of Alexandria. Finally, the empty tomb is in a separate category from “very certain” (75% of scholars accept the empty tomb as a historical fact). The reasons that most scholars accept the empty tomb as a historical is because of the attestation of enemies, the culturally embarrassing testimony of the women, and the Jerusalem factor.
After establishing the historical events that are accepted by historians, the authors simply compare these facts against various alternate theories that have been floated over time. The question is, do these theories deal with the facts and which theory clearly stands out from all the other ideas because it deals with the facts? In short, there is but one idea that stands alone. “Therefore, Jesus’ resurrection is more than the most plausible explanation to account for the data. It is the only explanation that accounts adequately for all of the facts.”
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2019
★★★★★ 5
Great Apologetic Resource
Format: Paperback
This is a great introductory resource for Christians who want to defend the hope that is within them. Habermas and Licona outline and defend a strong "minimal fact" argument for the resurrection of Jesus. In short, this historical argument argues for certain facts concerning the events surrounding the resurrection such as Jesus dying on a cross, the disciples claiming to have seen him risen, and Paul having a transforming experience of the risen Christ on the road to Damascus, etc. After arguing for all these alleged facts, the authors argue that a bodily resurrection fits the evidence better than any other theory. The strength of this argument is that it relies on multiple points each of which has a good body of evidential support. One can still claim agnosticism on the resurrection I suppose but I think that if one is honest (and philosophically open at least to be possibility of God acting in history via miracles) he or she would have to conclude that Jesus rose from the dead.
As I said above, this is a great introductory work. Someone who wants to delve further should read N.T. Wright's The Resurrection of the Son of God, and works by William Lane Craig on the subject. Read the other side as well both online at Internet Infidels and through books by Christian deconverts. Both authors quote other prominent New Testament scholars to back up their points while citing the original sources behind their alleged facts, ensuring that one who is earnestly seeking can check their work and investigate the matter for herself. The book also contains charts that visually summarize the points being made in the text which makes the material easier to remember. The book deals with alternative theories and then discusses the philosophy of Naturalism. I have read better critiques of Naturalism but this book does a good job of refuting pop-Naturalism I suppose.
The next part contains brief chapters defending the bodily resurrection view against the heavenly appearance view and that Jesus claimed divinity. I think these sparse chapters could have been lengthened, especially the chapter on Jesus' self-understanding to make a stronger case. The next chapter on Intelligent Design is really out of place in this book and should have been left out. If the authors wanted to give props to ID they should have done so in an Afterward or an appendix. The book is mainly about Jesus, what he was about and what happened to him, not about ID.
Lastly, the book has many endnotes which I much appreciate along with an extensive bibliography which I appreciate even more. Overall this was a very edifying read and can help you when someone challenges you about the evidential basis for your faith.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 21, 2010