SKU: 1029766994
snake tounge plant

snake tounge plant Buy Mother in Laws Tongue Phoenix, AZ | Sansevieria

Sale price$21.12 Regular price$23.47
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.87 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 22 - Jul 27

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

snake tounge plant Buy Mother in Laws Tongue Phoenix, AZ | SansevieriaThe Toughest Indoor Outdoor Plant for Phoenix Homes Mother in Law's Tongue Mother in Law's Tongue (Sansevieria trifasciata) is the single most indestructible plant you can grow in the Phoenix Valley. This upright, sword leafed succulent thrives in full sun patios, shaded entryways, bright indoor rooms, and dim office corners it simply does not care. Native to tropical West Africa, Sansevieria has adapted to survive extreme drought, low light, and

The Toughest Indoor-Outdoor Plant for Phoenix Homes — Mother in Law's Tongue

Mother in Law's Tongue (Sansevieria trifasciata) is the single most indestructible plant you can grow in the Phoenix Valley. This upright, sword-leafed succulent thrives in full sun patios, shaded entryways, bright indoor rooms, and dim office corners — it simply does not care. Native to tropical West Africa, Sansevieria has adapted to survive extreme drought, low light, and total neglect, making it the perfect choice for busy Scottsdale homeowners, Mesa rental properties, Gilbert office lobbies, and Chandler covered patios where other plants give up.

Mother in Law's Tongue Plant Details

Attribute Detail
Scientific Name Sansevieria trifasciata (syn. Dracaena trifasciata)
Common Names Mother in Law's Tongue, Snake Plant, Sansevieria, Saint George's Sword
Mature Height 2–4 feet
Mature Width 1–2 feet (clumping, spreads by rhizomes)
Growth Rate Slow to moderate — 2–4 new leaves per year
Sun Full sun to deep shade. Tolerates any light condition.
Water Very low. Extremely drought-tolerant. Overwatering is the #1 killer.
USDA Zones 9–12 (Phoenix is Zone 9b–10a — protect from hard frost below 32°F)
Soil Well-draining required. Adapts to Arizona caliche soils with added sand or gravel.
Foliage Evergreen — stiff, upright sword-shaped leaves with green-yellow variegation
Bonus NASA-proven air purifier — removes formaldehyde, benzene, and xylene

Mother in Law's Tongue Uses in Phoenix Landscapes

Covered Patios & Shaded Entryways

Mother in Law's Tongue is the top pick for Phoenix covered patios, north-facing entries, and shaded courtyards where most plants struggle. The upright, architectural form adds clean modern lines to outdoor living spaces in Scottsdale, Paradise Valley, and Chandler. Group 3–5 plants in matching pots for a designer-look patio border, or plant directly in a shaded landscape bed along a covered walkway.

Indoor Accent & Office Plant

Snake Plant is one of the few plants that actually thrives in air-conditioned indoor environments. Place it in a bright window, a dim hallway, or a fluorescent-lit office in Mesa or Tempe — it performs in all conditions. Its air-purifying qualities make it a smart choice for bedrooms, home offices, and commercial lobbies across the Phoenix Valley.

Modern Desert Container Plantings

The bold vertical leaves of Sansevieria look striking in sleek concrete, ceramic, or metal planters. Use a single large specimen as a patio focal point, or line up matching containers along a Gilbert pool fence or Peoria outdoor kitchen. Container planting also makes it easy to move indoors during rare hard freezes.

Low-Maintenance Ground Cover & Border

Planted en masse in a shaded landscape bed, Mother in Law's Tongue creates a dense, low-water ground cover that never needs mowing. Space 12–18 inches apart for a filled-in border within 2 seasons. Works beautifully under Desert Museum Palo Verde trees or along shaded property walls.

Best Time to Plant Mother in Law's Tongue in Phoenix

Spring (March–May) is the ideal planting window. Warm soil and long days fuel rapid root establishment. Fall (October–November) is the second-best option. Avoid planting outdoors in winter — Sansevieria is frost-sensitive and should be protected or brought inside when temperatures drop below 32°F.

How to Plant Mother in Law's Tongue

  1. Dig wide, not deep — 2x the root ball width, same depth. Sansevieria has shallow rhizome roots.
  2. Ensure drainage — break through any caliche layer. Add coarse sand or perlite if soil holds water.
  3. Backfill with native soil — a 50/50 mix of native soil and coarse sand is ideal for in-ground planting.
  4. Spacing — 12–18 inches apart for a border or mass planting; 2+ feet for standalone specimens.
  5. No water basin — Sansevieria prefers to dry out quickly. Skip the soil ring.
  6. Gravel mulch — 2 inches of decomposed granite. Avoid organic mulch that traps moisture against the base.

Watering Mother in Law's Tongue in Phoenix

First Year Watering Schedule

  • Weeks 1–2: Water once, deep soak, then let soil dry completely before watering again (5–7 days).
  • Months 1–3: Every 10–14 days in warm months.
  • Months 4–12: Every 2–3 weeks. Let the top 2 inches of soil dry between waterings.
  • After Year 1: Every 3–4 weeks in summer; monthly or less in winter. Outdoor plants in shade may need no supplemental water in winter.

Drip Irrigation

Place 1 emitter (0.5–1 GPH) 6 inches from the base. Sansevieria is far more likely to die from overwatering than underwatering. If leaves turn mushy or yellow at the base, you're watering too much. When in doubt, skip a cycle. Indoor plants in pots should be watered only when soil is completely dry — typically every 2–4 weeks.

Can Mother in Law's Tongue survive outdoors in Phoenix year-round?
Yes, in most of the Valley. It thrives outdoors in covered, frost-protected areas. During rare hard freezes (below 32°F), either cover the plant with frost cloth or move containers indoors. In most Phoenix winters, it handles outdoor conditions just fine.

Is Snake Plant toxic to pets?
Yes, Sansevieria is mildly toxic to dogs and cats if ingested. It typically causes nausea and vomiting. If you have curious pets, place the plant on an elevated surface or choose a pet-friendly alternative.

How do I propagate Mother in Law's Tongue?
The easiest method is division — separate the rhizome clumps when repotting. You can also propagate from leaf cuttings placed in well-draining soil, though this takes 2–3 months to root. Division gives you an instant new plant.

Why is my Snake Plant not growing?
In Phoenix, the most common reasons are overwatering (causes root rot) and too much direct summer afternoon sun (causes leaf burn). Move to bright indirect light or morning sun, reduce watering, and growth should resume in spring.

You May Also Like

  • Elephant's Ear — bold tropical foliage for shaded Phoenix patios and entryways.
  • Flapjacks — another tough succulent with dramatic paddle-shaped leaves that pairs well with Snake Plant.
  • Blue Elf Aloe — a compact, colorful aloe that thrives in the same containers and landscape beds.
  • Ponytail Palm — an architectural indoor-outdoor plant with similar indestructible qualities.
  • Firestick Euphorbia — adds vivid color contrast next to Snake Plant's green-yellow foliage.

How Many Mother in Law's Tongue Do I Need?

Snake Plant clumps stay narrow, just 1 to 2 feet wide, and spread slowly by rhizome, so it is planted in groups for a border, a mass bed, or matching containers. Space plants 12 to 18 inches apart and they knit into a filled border within about two seasons. Use this table to size a shaded bed or border run.

Border / bed length Spacing 12 in Spacing 18 in
10 ft 10 plants 7 plants
20 ft 20 plants 14 plants
Container cluster 3 to 5 plants per large pot for instant fullness

Mother in Law's Tongue Season-by-Season in Phoenix

  • Spring (Feb to Apr): Best planting window. Warm soil and long days push 2 to 4 new upright leaves and any rhizome spread for the year.
  • Summer (May to Sep): Thrives in heat under cover or bright shade. Direct west afternoon sun can scorch the leaves, so give it morning sun or filtered light. Monsoon humidity is fine as long as the soil drains and the base dries out between waterings.
  • Fall (Oct to Nov): Good secondary planting season. Growth slows as nights cool.
  • Winter (Dec to Jan): This is the one weak spot. Sansevieria is frost-sensitive and leaves turn mushy below about 32F. Cover with frost cloth on freeze nights or grow it in pots you can pull under cover or indoors.

At a Glance

✔ Drought-Tolerant   ✔ Evergreen   ✔ Low-Maintenance   ✔ Pool-Friendly (Low-Litter)   ✔ Fire-Wise   ✔ Deer & Rabbit-Resistant   ✔ Spineless

Plant It With

  • African Spear: a cylindrical Sansevieria cousin that layers texture in the same shaded bed.
  • Elephant's Ear: bold broad foliage for a tropical, shaded-patio pairing.
  • Flapjacks: paddle-shaped succulent that contrasts the upright sword leaves.
  • Ponytail Palm: another tough, sculptural indoor-outdoor plant with the same care needs.

Is Mother in Law's Tongue Right for Your Yard?

Snake Plant is ideal for covered patios, north entries, shaded courtyards, and indoor rooms anywhere in the Valley, in fast-draining soil or a pot where the roots dry out between waterings. It is not a fit for an exposed west-facing bed in full afternoon sun, a low spot that stays wet, or a frost-exposed location you cannot cover in winter. It is also mildly toxic to pets if chewed, so keep it out of reach of curious dogs and cats.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 1029766994

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell snake tounge plant

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
U
UJ
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Comprehensive, invaluable resource
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
This set is just massive. There is so much depth and insight, I don't know that I'll ever get to it all. One could literally read these volumes cover to cover because they're simply interesting and thought provoking. That said, I think it's best taken in small doses, perhaps focusing on single verses as they arise in daily life or in bible study. The physical quality of the volumes is top notch as well. This set would work well in a private library but could be equally appropriate for a church library. Absolutely recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 19, 2025
P
Peter P
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Valued study tool
Format: Hardcover
This resource is phenomenal. I’ve been including this commentary set in my resources to teach through the minor prophets, and I find myself really appreciating its solid, accurate, grace-filled contents. This includes the ESV text, supporting timelines, graphics, and charts, and expansive commentary supporting the text. This set will be a valued study tool for years to come.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
A
Andrew D. Lossing
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Imposing and Exceptional Quality
Format: Hardcover
The content and quality of the ESV commentary series matches that of their study Bibles. Broadly reformed, but not dogmatic on a particular angle, clear and concise, great for study. This commentary set isn't so much for digging deep in the weeds as it is for learning a solid Biblical Theology-based framework of the Bible. It's simpler than some, but much more in-depth than the ESV Study Bible, making it the next step for learning. The full set is imposing - lovely big, black hardbacks which look phenomenal on a bookshelf. Do I think this is practical for everybody? No, it might not be. You can get this kind of thing in digital form in one way or another these days (please understand that I don't like to go quite that digital, and I haven't researched what all is available). If you're pressed for living space, you might not want these. I live with a spouse in a midsize one-bedroom apartment. Fortunately, we already knew we wanted to prioritize some of our space for physical books, because we find pleasure in them. I will have to clear off some of my existing bookshelf space and relegate some books to a box in storage (consider that this set takes up all the space in a fairly large packing box, and you'll know how much you need). But it's worth it for me. I also see the acquisition of this box set as a bit of a prompt to take back up more in-depth study of the Scripture, which too often gets sidetracked by the rest of life getting in the way. Having the physical books are already something of a commitment. If all I had were ebooks or an app, I would likely never utilize them the same way. Last notes: these were packed very well. Each volume is shrink-wrapped in cellophane and none of the corners were damaged. They did a good job with that. Lastly, the price for these is fairly high. I acknowledge that. I think theological books are about on the same level, usually, however. So I did not see the need to deduct a star.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2025
P
Verified Purchase
Patrick S.
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
A fun and fulfilling book - would love to own the series
Format: Paperback
I had a lot of fun with this book. About a year ago, I really came down on the side of presuppositionalism and have studied the approach, see if it was useful against two of the leading atheistic books (God Is Not Great and The God Delusion), and now I wanted to match it up against four other views of apologetics. I will try to not go into too much detail here as I think the book is an important read for developing an apologetic standpoint. The book follows the 1)"model of Approach X is presented" then 2) "Response from other 4 approaches to counter Approach X" and then move on to the next approach. The book allows final statements from each writer for a final opportunity. Steven Cowan has a good introduction and epilogue that bookends the book well. Craig (Classical Approach) really surprised me as he brings in the role of the Holy Spirit early into the conversation. I really thought I was going to just be reading the finer points of the Kalam argument he's known for. The role of the Holy Spirit is reflected in the other authors' approaches as well and that was nice to see. It's also nice to see Craig debating with Christians for once and it's here that you really get to see his thought process contrasting with other people with the same worldview. There are issues that Craig tries to bring up against the presuppositionist view point that could be applied for him. He doesn't seem to get that all foundations are, by definition, circular because if you can appeal to something more foundational, then your foundation isn't your foundation at all. Craig seems to bring in some higher concepts about probability to make some of his points and I think that's really a miss for anyone who's not a high level philosopher (and even some philosophers might have issues understand what he's talking about here). Habermas (Evidential Approach) seems to have an undue hatred for presuppositionalism. He's also another person who doesn't realize that the approach he uses isn't really the foundation he is starting from. I think he resents doing the hard work that the other approaches then build up to. Feinberg (Cumulative Case Approach) seems to miss the point of presuppositionalism entirely. He's got the approach of what I call the "shotgun approach" in the sense that he wants to use everything possible and sees what he hits. Frame (Presuppostional Approach) does an ok job with presenting the method. I don't think he would be my first choice in representing the approach. He doesn't do a good job of explaining the "problem of circularity" isn't a problem. He just does an "ok" job. Clark (Reformed Epistemological Approach) is one I was excited to read. I liked some of his points he made when talking about the other approaches. Then I read his approach and was extremely disappointed. The biggest flaw is that he states literally that his approach doesn't help to show the Christian God is real. I would say then your apologetic method is worthless and not a real method at all. I understand the R.E. approach but if I went only with Clark's explanation and argumentation, I wouldn't have even considered it a real area of focus. The book is well laid out, the footnotes are at the bottom of the pages (SO helpful!), Cowan does a good job of wrangling the writers and offering expanded reading and other authors for each area of focus. Myself and my mentor spent from January to August every other week going over and discussing the book. Finding flaws, comparing and contrasting, and seeing where points were made and where points were missed. I think the biggest deficit we found was that the writers tended to assume agreement on definitions of words that played a big role (for example - the word "evidence" NEEDED to be defined right off the bat by every author and it wasn't until Frame in his response to the objections raised did we even have one person define it). My suggestion for this book to maximize the fun is to pick a method and try and defend that method throughout; even with the writer arguing your side. My book is filled with notes and highlights that just made this book a great enjoyment to meet and discuss with a fellow Believer about. It does not settle all the issues, but it does help you focus on the fact that we still aren't done learning yet. Final Grade - A-
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2013
L
Verified Purchase
Lyndon Unger
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009

recommand products